Thoughts on Tigerwood 95 vs Tigerwood Royale?

kesiro

Well-Known Member
#2
Interesting question and as a person who has both, I should be able to give more information than I am giving. It has been many months since I tried either one. I recall that both were very similar in scent profile but the TR being more of everything. Every aspect of what makes the 95 so great is there but more intense, deeper and even more long lasting.
I will try to do another head to head tomorrow.
 

Simla House

Well-Known Member
#3
Interesting question and as a person who has both, I should be able to give more information than I am giving. It has been many months since I tried either one. I recall that both were very similar in scent profile but the TR being more of everything. Every aspect of what makes the 95 so great is there but more intense, deeper and even more long lasting.
I will try to do another head to head tomorrow.
Thank you!
I hope it's a fair question to ask, as there are going to be many differences in wood batches, cooking etc.
There shouldn't be a "versus" between oils really, just looking for thoughts or whatever comes to mind.
I don't really have much experience with this type of wood, and the "tiger wood" oudh I purchased years ago in India probably isn't a good reference.
 

Oudamberlove

Well-Known Member
#4
Just from memory:rolleyes:
TW95 has a Malaysian Floral with a Chinese medicine twist.
TW Royale has a musky backbone supporting a lovely perfume "blend" of gold Ambergris with Bergamot. I say "blend" because those notes have merged together. Also, Royale is a bit more full-bodied, maybe due to a higher grade of agarwood.

Any two oils can go head-to-head:confused:
But Subjectivity always wins:p
 

kooolaid79

Well-Known Member
#5
Just from memory:rolleyes:
TW95 has a Malaysian Floral with a Chinese medicine twist.
TW Royale has a musky backbone supporting a lovely perfume "blend" of gold Ambergris with Bergamot. I say "blend" because those notes have merged together. Also, Royale is a bit more full-bodied, maybe due to a higher grade of agarwood.

Any two oils can go head-to-head:confused:
But Subjectivity always wins:p
Wow what a awesome observation Sir!! I am thankful and blessed to be surrounded with People who know so much more about Oudh then me. Truly awesome!
 

Simla House

Well-Known Member
#6
Just from memory:rolleyes:
TW95 has a Malaysian Floral with a Chinese medicine twist.
TW Royale has a musky backbone supporting a lovely perfume "blend" of gold Ambergris with Bergamot. I say "blend" because those notes have merged together. Also, Royale is a bit more full-bodied, maybe due to a higher grade of agarwood.

Any two oils can go head-to-head:confused:
But Subjectivity always wins:p
Much appreciated, Oudamberlove!
 

saint458

Well-Known Member
#7
Right now at last night during prayer _ a heavy swipe of Tigerwood95 & .... ahhhhhh ... can't really describe the feeling. Regal _ at the same time spiritual & of course medicinal. It's true that TR is made from agarwood which are many grade higher than Tigerwood95 _ but Tigerwood95 has it's own type of sophisticated beauty & appeal. Specially the dry-down. TW95 can bring some ancient time travel during dry-down which is significantly different from any other oud.

* One secret difference between both _ you overlook TW95 & forget about it then it comes very gently with soft steps ... with it's ancient majestic appearance. Not always present loudly. At least consciously.

** TR is not like that. Always present with it's 'Royale' qualities. Even surrounds louder than some legends.
 
Last edited:

kooolaid79

Well-Known Member
#8
Right now at last night during prayer _ a heavy swipe of Tigerwood95 & .... ahhhhhh ... can't really describe the feeling. Regal _ at the same time spiritual & of course medicinal. It's true that TR is made from agarwood which are many grade higher than Tigerwood95 _ but Tigerwood95 has it's own type of sophisticated beauty & appeal. Specially the dry-down. TW95 can bring some ancient time travel during dry-down which is significantly different from any other oud.

* One secret difference between both _ you overlook TW95 & forget about it then it comes very gently with soft steps ... with it's ancient majestic appearance. Not always present loudly. At least consciously.

** TR is not like that. Always present with it's 'Royale' qualities. Even surrounds louder than some legends.
You summed it up pretty nicely. Can't agree more with you on the gentle part of TW95. It does come slowly but gets better each time, it gives its aroma. TR is a boss type. When TR is on, you know that this oil has come out for a challenge.
 

kooolaid79

Well-Known Member
#10
Tigerwood 95 is like the old blind grandpa that sits in the corner that nobody ever talks to, then you get someone to be an interpreter for you and find out he fought in WWII, and is more ancient than the Banyan trees nearby that Santo Nino guards from harm.
Woah! Wow that was awesome Sir!
 

Simla House

Well-Known Member
#15
Ahem... Sooo, if Tigerwood Royale is John Coltrane... I guess Tigerwood 1995 would be... Alice Coltrane?
Devoted partner, pianist, harpsichordist and harp player determined to carry on the spiritual/musical legacy of her husband?
I like where this is going! :D
I better sign up for 95, I'm a fan of both.
 
Last edited:

saint458

Well-Known Member
#16
Conclusion : TR is overall winner anyway.
(I think no one would trade his bottle of TR instead of TW95. :p )

* But you can keep & enjoy both if you like. Each has it's own appeal anyway.
 

Ensar Oud

Well-Known Member
#17
Conclusion : TR is overall winner anyway.
(I think no one would trade his bottle of TR instead of TW95.)
* But you can keep & enjoy both if you like. Each has it's own appeal anyway.
Personally, I don't see the either/or scenario at all with these two oils, they are that unique. Tigerwood Royale is regal and jammy with some medicinal tones; 1995 is oudy & woody with an incense note reminiscent of Oud Royale No 1 (if a cross-species comparison can be made). They share the 'Tigerwood' in the name, are both classic Malaysian malaccensis, and were cooked in the same distillery. But the profiles couldn't be more distinct.

PS: Perhaps the greatest similarity between them is that they're both seriously undervalued at the moment. Tigerwood Royale shouldn't sell for one cent less than $1,500, and Tigerwood 1995 should sell for no less than $790. If I spent that much, I wouldn't be able to make them. But the day is coming, folks.... It sure is coming....
 
Last edited:

Simla House

Well-Known Member
#18
Personally, I don't see the either/or scenario at all with these two oils: quite frankly I don't even see the need to compare them, they are that unique. Tigerwood Royale is regal and jammy with some medicinal tones; 1995 is oudy & woody with an incense note reminiscent of Oud Royale No 1 (if a cross-species comparison can be made).

Bottom line: they're different oils, from top to bottom. They share the 'Tigerwood' in the name, are both classic Malaysian malaccensis, and were cooked in the same distillery. But the profiles couldn't be more distinct.
Thank you, this is more or less the answer I was looking for, although I'm loving all the creative thoughts and anecdotes.
I was curious because they have a similar name and origin, and I only have TR as a reference.
 

kooolaid79

Well-Known Member
#20
PS: Perhaps the greatest similarity between them is that they're both seriously undervalued at the moment. Tigerwood Royale shouldn't sell for one cent less than $1,500, and Tigerwood 1995 should sell for no less than $790. If I spent that much, I wouldn't be able to make them. But the day is coming, folks.... It sure is coming....
This is your humbleness and piety to share with us some of these priceless gems at such reasonable prices. It's sad to see people say such things which disheartens the very same people who make these available to us.
Keep your heads high and IA we will stand by your side.
Both of these oils are magnificent and beautiful. I don't care what people think or say.